Field report 16 · Operations and observability

Measure accessibility, don't estimate it: an audit across 32 pages

How usable a website really is, for every user, in both colour modes and on every screen size.

Status
From practice Experience from our own operations.
Published
Publisher
SIMO GmbH, Aschaffenburg, Germany

Starting questionHow usable is a website really, for every user, in both colour modes and on every screen size?

What we did

We tested 32 pages automatically in two colour modes and four screen widths: performance, accessibility, contrast, multilingual content and layout.

After the fixes, contrast errors dropped by around 70 percent and language errors by around 62 percent. Remaining work stayed open and was named.

What it means for business architecture

Accessibility is a requirement you can measure. Automating it repeatably turns it into a quality gate rather than a one-off exercise.

Learnings

  1. A light and a dark mode double the test scope. Errors often cluster in one of the two.
  2. Before-and-after measurements make progress provable.
  3. Open issues belong explicitly in the report, not under the carpet.
  • accessibility
  • WCAG
  • contrast
  • quality assurance

Matching consulting service

From the Lab into consulting.

What we trial in the Lab, SIMO GmbH puts into practice as consultants: Business Data Strategy & Architecture for AI, following the Zero Friction Data Flow principle. These services relate to this report:

45 minutes, free of charge, with the SIMO GmbH consultants. The form is on simo-online.com.

More reports on the same topic